DETERMINANTS FOR EFFECTIVE MONITORING & EVALUATION SYSTEMS ON PERFORMANCE OF COUNTY GOVERNMENT FUNDED PROJECTS IN MANDERA COUNTY

  • MOHAMEDNUR ISMAIL MAALIM Masters Candidate, School of Social Science, Mount Kenya University, Kenya
  • NAOMI NDUTA NJOROGE, PhD Lecturer, School of Social Science, Mount Kenya University, Kenya
Keywords: Community Participation, Capacity Building, Partnerships, Monitoring & Evalution Transparency

Abstract

The implementation of effective monitoring & evaluation systems is crucial for the success of government-funded projects. The study's purpose was to evaluate the determinants for effective monitoring & evaluation systems on performance of county government funded projects in Mandera County. The specific objectives were to determine the effects of community participation, capacity building, partnership and transparency on M&E on performance of county government funded projects in Mandera County. The study was guided by the institutional theory, resource dependency theory, agency theory, and stakeholder theory. A case study research design was used for this investigation. There were 120 responders in the target population. The study employed a stratified random sampling technique. Quantitative data was assessed using the SPSS software, version 26, and descriptive statistics including the mean, percentages, and standard deviation. Multiple regression analysis and variance analysis were done. The results of the analysis were displayed in tables. The study found out that there is moderate agreement on communities receiving feedback on project progress. There is moderate agreement on high attendance, but responses vary to some extent. There is a strong consensus on the existence of Partnership and partnership initiatives during project implementations. On average, stakeholders are moderately involved in the project, contributing to Transparencyduring implementation. The study concluded that while there is some involvement, there might be room for improvement in increasing in resource management. While attendance is generally acknowledged, efforts might be needed to enhance participation. Partnershipare well-acknowledged and consistenty. The study recommended that county governments should consider exploring ways to enhance and encourage community participation in resource management. The county governments should explore strategies to increase attendance. County governments should continue fostering and potentially expanding Partnership efforts to enhance project implementations. County governments should focus on maintaining compliance with laws and regulations to enhance transparency and accountability.

Author Biographies

MOHAMEDNUR ISMAIL MAALIM, Masters Candidate, School of Social Science, Mount Kenya University, Kenya

Masters Candidate, School of Social Science, Mount Kenya University, Kenya

NAOMI NDUTA NJOROGE, PhD, Lecturer, School of Social Science, Mount Kenya University, Kenya

Lecturer, School of Social Science, Mount Kenya University, Kenya

References

Adams, J. (2018). Impact of monitoring & evaluation systems on the performance of county government funded projects in the United States. Public Management Journal, 42(3), 45-58.

Akol, P., et al. (2022). Participatory Monitoring & evaluation: A Catalyst for Improved Project Outcomes in Ugandan County Governments. Development Policy Review, 27(2), 89-104.

Dlamini, B., & Nxumalo, T. (2019). The Role of Monitoring & evaluation Practices in Enhancing the Performance of Government-Funded Projects in South Africa. Public Administration Review, 24(2), 78-91.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.

Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404-1427

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Johnson, R., & Smith, T. (2020). Determinants of effective monitoring & evaluation systems for county government-funded projects: A case study in the United States. Journal of Public Policy, 15(2), 78-92.

Kasule, J., & Mugisha, F. (2019). Enhancing Monitoring & evaluation Systems for County Government-Funded Projects in Uganda: The Role of Clear Objectives and Indicators. Public Policy Journal, 36(3), 145-160.

Langat, C. B., & Njoroge, J. (2021). Training as a capacity building practice and performance of county assemblies in Kenya: A case of Kericho County Assembly. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 8 (4), 782 – 790.

Lubega, S. (2019). Data-Driven Decision-Making and Responsive Governance in Ugandan County Governments: A Monitoring & evaluation Perspective. Governance Quarterly, 21(4), 176-191.

Madey, J. & Chege P. (2022). Participatory Project Cycle Management and Performance of Donor Funded Projects in Mandera County, Kenya. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Project Management, 6(3), 77 - 91. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2084

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.

Mthembu, N. (2017). Effective Monitoring & evaluation Frameworks: Lessons from South Africa. Development Policy Review, 19(3), 143-158.

Mkhize, S. (2018). Monitoring & evaluation of Social Welfare Programs in South Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Social Development, 35(4), 210-225.

Mkutano, S. M. & Sang, P. (2018). Project management practices and performance of non-governmental organizations projects in Nairobi City County, Kenya. International Academic Journal of Information Sciences and Project Management, 3(3), 1-22

Musyula A (2014) factors affecting the performance of Non-Governmental Organizations in Kenya, using a case of Action Aid International. USIU-A Digital Repository. URI: http://erepo.usiu.ac.ke/11732/101

Nabukalu, A. (2018). Resource Allocation and Capacity Building for Effective Monitoring & evaluation Systems in Ugandan County Governments. Journal of Public Administration, 17(1), 54-68.

Namugera, R. (2023). Integrating Feedback Mechanisms for Adaptive Management in County Government-Funded Projects in Uganda. Journal of Development Studies, 39(3), 201-215.

Nkosi, M., et al. (2021). Gautrain Rapid Rail Link: A Case Study on the Implementation of Monitoring & evaluation Practices in South Africa. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 27(1), 45-58.

Ochieng, B., & Ndung'u, S. (2020). The Effectiveness of Monitoring & evaluation Systems in Promoting Accountability in Kenyan County Projects. Public Management Review, 40(2), 121-135.

Okello, G., & Odoi, I. (2020). Stakeholder Engagement and Technology Use in Monitoring & evaluation Systems: A Study of County Government-Funded Projects in Uganda. International Journal of Development, 30(2), 87-101.

Ouma, B. (2017). Trends in Monitoring & evaluation Systems in Kenyan County Governments. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 22(4), 176-191.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row.

Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Sage Publications.

Ssempijja, E., et al. (2021). Building Personnel Capacity for Effective Monitoring & evaluation Systems in County Government-Funded Projects in Uganda. Administration and Society, 44(4), 321-336.

Van Zyl, A. (2022). Education Reforms in South Africa: A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Monitoring & evaluation System. Education Policy Analysis, 42(2), 91-106.

Williams, L. (2019). Improving monitoring & evaluation systems for county government-funded projects in the United States: A review of current practices. Public Administration Review, 37(4), 112-125.

Zulu, M. (2020). Ensuring Accountability and Transparency through Monitoring & evaluation Practices in South Africa. Public Accountability Journal, 32(3), 121-135.
Published
2024-10-25
Section
Articles