AUTHORITY DISTRIBUTION AND LAND CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN ARID AND SEMI-ARID COUNTIES IN KENYA

Abstract

The study sought to determine the relationship between authority distribution and land conflict resolution in Arid and Semi-Arid Counties in Kenya. The study is anchored on the Polycentric Governance Theory. The target population is 803 individuals from the 23 ASAL Counties. The target population includes: Land Department Officials: 115 individuals (5 officials per county across 23 counties); Sub County Administrators: 113 individuals and Ward Administrators: 575 individuals. The study adopted descriptive and correlational research designs. The study used a sample of 206 respondents determined by use of Slovin Sample size determination formulae. The qualitative was analyzed by the use of content analysis. The quantitative data was analyzed by use of the descriptive and inferential analysis. The rejection of the null hypotheses underscores the significant roles that diverse administrative structures, stakeholder participation, alternative dispute settlement mechanisms, institutional oversight, and comprehensive legislative frameworks play in resolving land conflicts in Kenya's Arid and Semi-Arid Counties. Administrative structures like tribunals, registration agencies, and customary institutions, along with stakeholder involvement and alternative dispute methods such as mediation and arbitration, foster culturally accepted, efficient, and sustainable conflict resolutions. Robust institutional frameworks and comprehensive legislation further enhance governance mechanisms, ensuring effective, inclusive, and equitable conflict management and resolution in these regions. Recommendations include fostering greater coordination among administrative entities, establishing multi-stakeholder platforms, creating dedicated alternative dispute resolution centers, strengthening institutional oversight, and continuously adapting the legislative framework to emerging challenges. These strategies highlight the importance of inclusivity, cultural relevance, and synergy in enhancing the effectiveness, equity, and sustainability of land conflict resolution efforts in these regions.