OPERATIONAL PROCESSES AND PERFORMANCE OF PRIVATE CHARTERED UNIVERSITIES IN KENYA
Main Article Content
Abstract
In today’s world managers play a very important role in ensuring organisations achieve their objectives and private universities are not any different for theme survive the turbulent and dynamic environment they need to align their internal operational processes in order to improve performance. This study sought to investigate the influence of operational capabilities on the performance of private chartered universities in Kenya. The study was anchored on the resource based view theory and the dynamic capabilities theory. The study was pegged on a positivist research philosophy while the research method employed was a mix of both qualitative and quantitative techniques. The research collection tool was subjected to validity tests where the lowest acceptable Cronbach alpha threshold was 0.7. Data was collected from all the twenty five private chartered universities in Kenya. The sample size was 230 respondents from all the private chartered universities in Kenya using self-administered questionnaires. The data was then cleaned, coded and analysed using SPSS software. The study used binary logistic regression to carry out the inferential statistics. Binary logistic model was fitted so as to establish the cause-and-effect relationship existing among the study variables. From the research findings private universities that had strong processes were 1.640 times more likely to increase their log odds of recording improved performance. The study also conducted diagnostic tests which were recommended for logistic regression models. The study therefore recommended that private universities need to invest in technology that would enable them to automate their processes and ease the flow of processes from one department to another. The study also recommended that universities need to integrate all their university processes in order to ensure seamless transactions for students.
Article Details
References
Baia, E., Ferreira, J. J., & Rodrigues, R. (2019). Value and rareness of resources and capabilities as sources of competitive advantage and superior performance. Knowledge Management Research & Practice.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Bejinaru, R. (2017). Universities in the knowledge economy. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 251-271.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change. Administrative science quarterly, 42(1), 1-34.
Commission for University Education (CUE). (2022). Regulations & Standards for University Education. Nairobi: CUE
Ebegbetale, C. I., & Okon, S. E. (2022). Relationship between industry-level dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage of Nigerian SMEs. Business and Entrepreneurial Review, 22(2), 189-202.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic management journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121.
Girod, S. J., & Whittington, R. (2017). Reconfiguration, restructuring and firm performance: Dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism. Strategic management journal, 38(5), 1121-1133.
Goldfarb, B., & King, A. A. (2016). Scientific apophenia in strategic management research: Significance tests & mistaken inference. Strategic Management Journal, 37(1), 167-176.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
Hartini, H. (2023). Analysis of Student Learning Motivation on The Basis of Providing Guidance and Counseling Services to Higher Education. International Research-Based Education Journal, 5, 1-17.
Kering, V. K., Kilika, J. M., & Njuguna, J. W. (2020). Influence of Human Resource Processes on the Performance of Selected Manufacturing SMEs in Nairobi City County, Kenya. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(6).
Kirugumi, A. T., Theuri, M. M., & Magu, D. M. (2021). Influence of Managerial Capability On Internationalization Status of Public Universities In Kenya.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of international business studies, 24, 625-645.
Kubai, P. K., Gachunga, H., & Odhiambo, R. (2022). Transactional Leadership and Organizational Performance: A study of Private Universities in Kenya. Kunz, W.(2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economic security of enterprises. Security Dimensions. International and National Studies,(36), 22-37.
Mkansi, M., & Acheampong, E. A. (2012). Research philosophy debates and classifications: students’ dilemma. Electronic journal of business research methods, 10(2), pp132-140.
Peteraf, M. (2018). Resource-based theories. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Pisano, G. P. (1994). Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic management journal, 15(S1), 85-100.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long range planning, 51(1), 40-49.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Williamson, O. E. (1999). Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives. Strategic management journal, 20(12), 1087-1108.
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic management journal, 24(10), 991-995.